|
Written by DefyantOne28
|
|
Sep 13, 2009 at 08:49 PM |
Arguments could be sparked that claim that James Whale is the inventor of the modern horror film. “Dracula” may have come first, but for me Whale’s “Frankenstein” plays truer, more tragic and meaningful. By humanizing the monster and utilizing the remarkable talent of the immortal Boris Karloff, Whale gave birth to a type of filmmaking that still rings true almost eighty years later. And while many talk of Whale’s two iconic entries into the world of Baron Frankenstein and his monster, very little is said about Whale’s other work. One of the greater “lost” Whale films came one year after the phenomenal success of “Frankenstein” and re-teams Whale with Karloff, 1932’s “The Old Dark House”.
Seeking shelter from a violent rainstorm in the remote English countryside. A group of water logged travelers take refuge inside a foreboding mansion that is inhabited by the Femm family and their psychotic butler Morgan (Karloff). As the night progresses, dark family secrets are revealed and a mysterious family member threatens to destroy them all. Write Comment (0 comments) |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by DefyantOne28
|
|
Aug 31, 2009 at 12:01 AM |
|
There’s a lot of talk lately about the relevance of print media in today’s instant net news world. Why would we still need glossy, expensive magazines with the instant knowledge that the internet provides today? We have blogs, forums twitter, and each of the magazines that we read even have a website for web based content, so where’s the need for print?
For my money, there are so few magazines that actually provide me with the ammunition to fire at the naysayers when it comes to the defense of print media. So many of them are filled primarily with ads, and rarely focus on deconstructing subjects or they often recycle opinions that are usually based on similar backgrounds and experiences rather then get different perspectives on them. With cinema publications especially guilty of covering the same subjects solely for the purpose of selling magazines. Why do we need thirty different interviews with Brad Pitt about “Inglorious Basterds” that basically recycle the same material? Do we need to have the same reviews and exposes in every single magazine we choose?? I have already spoken about Paracinema magazine and I hope to keep reviewing every new issue as they become available. I can’t speak enough about how important it is to genre film fans that magazines like it exist. It is truly a publication with independent minds who whole heartedly love the subject of cult cinema. It’s not just another series of reviews and interviews with stars. It’s a series well thought out and thought provoking essays about the films, actors, and filmmakers that they truly care about. Write Comment (0 comments) |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by DefyantOne28
|
|
Sep 30, 2009 at 09:30 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>
|